Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 01:31

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What’s next?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Minjee Lee wins third major title at windswept KPMG Women’s PGA Championship - NBC Sports
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Why did the USA stick their noses in Ukraine's business? They wanted to be neutral for so long.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Do you have any controversial and unpopular K-pop opinions?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
‘Bianca Censori Candy’ Trends as Amid New Lingerie Photos - Yahoo
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Bitcoin Price Rises. This Could Be the Next Big Crypto IPO After Success of Circle Stock. - Barron's